You're sitting in a cafe, on a first date with your latest match from eHarmony. As he begins to tell you about his love of 1970s science fiction, and his passion for collecting sweater-vests, you think to yourself "I knew it. All of the good guys in Boston are taken. This is what I'm left with."
What you have just articulated to yourself is a theory. Like a scientist piecing together theories about gravity or evolution, we are all in the business of forming and proving theories about the way the world works. Here are some other theories you might have heard floating around:
"Childbirth is horrible"
"My girlfriends are always there for me."
"The economy is just going to keep falling farther and farther."
"I'm good at public speaking."
"My husband doesn't communicate his feelings very well."
"There is never enough time in the day."
"One good deed deserves another."
"Romance dies with marriage."
We form our theories based on our life experiences. But once we have a theory, we usually see the world through the lens of that theory. In other words, we selectively collect evidence that supports our theory. For example, if your theory is that "I am good at public speaking," then every time that you deliver a well-received talk, you smile and say "yup, that's me!" If you once give a talk that does not end in thunderous applause, you are likely to shrug and say "the audience must have been in a food coma" or "it's too bad that that audience isn't into my line of work." Because, heck, you're good at public speaking, so it couldn't have been you.
The thing about theories is that they are subjective-- you can pretty much gather evidence for any theory you want. For example, when I was recently hanging out with a couple of married friends, Jill and Mike, the topic of conversation turned to the relationship that Jill had with her friends. Mike was adamant that Jill's friends took advantage of Jill, and treated her poorly. Jill shook her head and said that her friends were great people, and that she supported them through their hard times just like they would support her if the roles were reversed. Jill and Mike brought up a few different examples, and on each one they had their list of evidence for why the friend was or was not taking advantage of Jill. And each was compelling.
The beautiful thing about this subjectivity, then, is that you can choose which theories you want to be in the business of proving. For example, in a blog post a few months ago, I described my attitude toward getting my wallet stolen in a coffee shop. Instead of the theory "it is a real bummer getting your wallet stolen," I opted for the theory of "it's no big deal getting a wallet stolen." And guess what? It really wasn't a big deal. Yes, I canceled my credit cards, and we changed our locks. But it was like brushing my teeth... nothing noteworthy.
Here are some other great examples of reauthored theories:
"I have no idea what I want to do with my life. I am lost," reauthored to "My heart knows what I want to do, and the clues are all around me."
"Cleaning my bathroom is so annoying," reauthored to "Cleaning my bathroom is rewarding."
"It's impossible to stay in touch with my friends and family because they have moved so far away," reauthored to "I can have meaningful relationships over the phone, and I have plenty of time and money to visit as often as I need to in order to build the relationships I want."
"I make a lot of bad choices," reauthored to "I make a lot of good choices."
Once you switch theories and believe the new one, it is amazing how easy it is to prove it. You start to notice the good phone conversations you have with your friends, the time you made the wise choice to take a cab instead of the subway, and the little things in your day that you enjoy doing (which, pieced together, can give you the big picture of what career you would be passionate about). Moreover, you create more of those experiences, because you want more evidence to prove yourself right.
We're all in the business of proving theories: which ones would you like to be proving?
Image courtesy of jana739.wordpress.com
Friday, February 27, 2009
Sunday, February 22, 2009
Cultivating Positivity
I recently noticed that I was harboring (heck, nurturing) a storm of negative thoughts. One of my particular favorite flavors is about time, and how I am never going to get it all done. Here is a brain dump of last Tuesday:
But the truth is, negative thoughts are not like weather, but more like the clothes we wear or the food we put in our mouths... entirely under our control. When these thoughts popped up in my head, I chose to look at them, expand upon them, and give them a nice cozy home in my mind. Yeah, what about that obedience school? Let's dwell on that for a while.
Given that negative thoughts are a choice, so too are positive thoughts. Oooo, let's bring in some of the. Please. So I have prescribed a simple positivity exercise for myself, that I repeat a few times per day. I make a list of 10 good things that have happened so far in the day. And I take a few seconds just to celebrate each one.
It's amazing how much this simple exercise tickles and massages the soul. Feels so good... I'll take this warm rain over hail any day.
- "How can it be 3pm already? I've gotten nothing done!"
- "Oh crap, I'm traveling to Costa-friggin-Rica in two weeks, and we don't have any hostels booked. Gotta add that to the list... but when? Ahhh!"
- "Stupid dog just peed on the floor... again. She's never going to get this litterbox training thing! Gotta find time to take her to obedience school. Why hasn't Anthony booked obedience school yet? I thought this was his job."
- "I should have sent those bachelorette party invites out last week."
- "Taxes are going to be so complicated this year. Uggggh."
- "I didn't go on that run today I had hoped for... I feel flabby."
But the truth is, negative thoughts are not like weather, but more like the clothes we wear or the food we put in our mouths... entirely under our control. When these thoughts popped up in my head, I chose to look at them, expand upon them, and give them a nice cozy home in my mind. Yeah, what about that obedience school? Let's dwell on that for a while.
Given that negative thoughts are a choice, so too are positive thoughts. Oooo, let's bring in some of the. Please. So I have prescribed a simple positivity exercise for myself, that I repeat a few times per day. I make a list of 10 good things that have happened so far in the day. And I take a few seconds just to celebrate each one.
- "I emptied my inbox. Yay me!"
- "I really connected with Megan on our call today."
- "I am proud of that article on parent traits I wrote today."
- "That quesadilla for lunch was fantastic."
- "Anthony gave me the cutest smile this morning."
- And yes, "My dog just hit the litterbox! Good girl!"
It's amazing how much this simple exercise tickles and massages the soul. Feels so good... I'll take this warm rain over hail any day.
Monday, February 16, 2009
The goal: Happiness
My friend and fellow journeyer, Duane, recently pointed out to me that I have thus far forgotten to discuss an important premise on this blog: why do any of this personal development work in the first place? It seemed to Duane that a lot of this stuff is about people being hyper-critical about themselves, or people telling other people that they need to change.
So let me explain how I see the role of this blog, and the work I do.
The end goal is to be happy. How do people become happy? From my perspective, happiness comes from doing what you want, in the body you want, with the people you want. It means actively designing every aspect of your life, of which, at the Handel Group, we believe there are 18. It means setting a dream for each area, and living those dreams. In other words, great happiness comes from authoring the book of your life in whatever way you want to, and writing a darned good plot for yourself.
The thing is, oftentimes we do not design aspects of our lives. We don't have a clearly-defined dream for our body, relationship, or career. Or maybe we do, but we're not living it. And this is where my work begins. I help people decide what they want the book of their lives to say, and then help them put pen to paper and create. It's not an easy process, because we're all in the business of making up cockamamie as to why we can't have what we want, and why we really don't want it to begin with.
At the end of the day, it doesn't matter what you want the book of your life to say. You could choose:
So let me explain how I see the role of this blog, and the work I do.
The end goal is to be happy. How do people become happy? From my perspective, happiness comes from doing what you want, in the body you want, with the people you want. It means actively designing every aspect of your life, of which, at the Handel Group, we believe there are 18. It means setting a dream for each area, and living those dreams. In other words, great happiness comes from authoring the book of your life in whatever way you want to, and writing a darned good plot for yourself.
The thing is, oftentimes we do not design aspects of our lives. We don't have a clearly-defined dream for our body, relationship, or career. Or maybe we do, but we're not living it. And this is where my work begins. I help people decide what they want the book of their lives to say, and then help them put pen to paper and create. It's not an easy process, because we're all in the business of making up cockamamie as to why we can't have what we want, and why we really don't want it to begin with.
At the end of the day, it doesn't matter what you want the book of your life to say. You could choose:
- "Embracing the unpredictable: the life of a global wanderer" or "The virtues of routine: the beauty of the 9-to-5 schedule."
- "A house of children's laughter" or "A house of meows."
- "The high-powered adventures of the world's richest CEO" or "Getting from A to B: the hidden world of a mail sorter."
Friday, February 13, 2009
Two birds with one stone
I read a great quote from Robert Stavins, a Harvard professor of business and government, in the New Yorker a few weeks ago:
"Let's say I want to have a dinner party. It's important that I cook dinner, and I'd also like to take a shower before the guests arrive. You might think, 'Well, it would be really efficient for me to cook dinner in the shower.' But it turns out that if I try that, I'm not going to get very clean and it's not going to be a very good dinner."
I love this idea that the two birds you would get with that proverbial one stone might not be as fulfilling as one bird deliberately chosen.
Another great example of this tradeoff comes from my colleague Weston. When he entered college, his two passions were chemistry and painting, and so he initially planned on becoming, you guessed it, a paint engineer. The guy who figures out the chemistry of new paints. There must be someone out there who has that job, right? It seemed like a great idea, until he realized that this career would bypass both the creative expression of painting (which is what drew him to paint in the first place), and the most exciting cutting-edge areas of chemistry research, thereby leaving him unfulfilled on both counts. So he chose one of them, and is now a thriving biological chemist of world renown.
We choose these chimera activities for a variety of reasons. Maybe we are indecisive about a choice between two things that excite us, and so we try to do both. Maybe we are afraid of taking a leap and choosing something that is risky, and so we hold onto something that is more stable at the same time. Sometimes this strategy works well, but other times it holds us back from pursuing our passions whole-hog. Painting. Chemistry. Cooking that really great meal. Nothing feels quite so great as trying all-out for something that truly excites you.
In this day and age of multi-tasking, it’s worthwhile to take a step back and make sure that we are picking and pursuing our birds deliberately, and not just going for the riccoche shot.
"Let's say I want to have a dinner party. It's important that I cook dinner, and I'd also like to take a shower before the guests arrive. You might think, 'Well, it would be really efficient for me to cook dinner in the shower.' But it turns out that if I try that, I'm not going to get very clean and it's not going to be a very good dinner."
I love this idea that the two birds you would get with that proverbial one stone might not be as fulfilling as one bird deliberately chosen.
Another great example of this tradeoff comes from my colleague Weston. When he entered college, his two passions were chemistry and painting, and so he initially planned on becoming, you guessed it, a paint engineer. The guy who figures out the chemistry of new paints. There must be someone out there who has that job, right? It seemed like a great idea, until he realized that this career would bypass both the creative expression of painting (which is what drew him to paint in the first place), and the most exciting cutting-edge areas of chemistry research, thereby leaving him unfulfilled on both counts. So he chose one of them, and is now a thriving biological chemist of world renown.
We choose these chimera activities for a variety of reasons. Maybe we are indecisive about a choice between two things that excite us, and so we try to do both. Maybe we are afraid of taking a leap and choosing something that is risky, and so we hold onto something that is more stable at the same time. Sometimes this strategy works well, but other times it holds us back from pursuing our passions whole-hog. Painting. Chemistry. Cooking that really great meal. Nothing feels quite so great as trying all-out for something that truly excites you.
In this day and age of multi-tasking, it’s worthwhile to take a step back and make sure that we are picking and pursuing our birds deliberately, and not just going for the riccoche shot.
Tuesday, February 3, 2009
Designing Your Life, Part II: The PR Agent
Most of the people in the MIT Design Your Life class are looking for better relationships. They want to find true love and companionship, or develop it in existing relationships. Heck, don't we all?
This connection with other people can be found by developing intimacy in our relationships. What is intimacy? It is being transparent: sharing the real you.
But most of us aren’t in the business of sharing the real us. Instead, we employ a PR agent in our head who spins how we think and feel so that it is palatable to others. The agent censors most thoughts through a filter of "if I say this, how will I look? Will other person still like me?"
Just take a look at your favorite celebrity mag as an example. Brangelina has a big fight and Angelina moves her herd of kids to her mother's house in Florida. "She's taking the kids on a vacation to get some sun" claims Angelina's PR agent. "Brad will be joining them shortly."
The problem with employing PR agents is that our relationships then become conversations between agents. Mine will talk to yours and they will invent a fabulous story. Sounds great to anyone overhearing us on the subway. But we sure don't know much about the actual people represented by those agents. Do we really want to have relationships with our friends and family similar to our relationship with Angelina Jolie?
Here are some examples of the PR agent from the class participants:
Each of these people felt disconnected from their friend/advisor/husband/mother, and was looking for a greater sense of connection. Given the PR spin they have been feeding these people, it's no wonder.
The solution? Tell the truth. Let the real you come out and play... you don't need a PR agent. The real story, while more quirky and messy and can-of-worm opening, leads to a deep connection and a sense of pride and confidence in yourself. If Angelina is having a fight with Brad, it really is OK.
This connection with other people can be found by developing intimacy in our relationships. What is intimacy? It is being transparent: sharing the real you.
But most of us aren’t in the business of sharing the real us. Instead, we employ a PR agent in our head who spins how we think and feel so that it is palatable to others. The agent censors most thoughts through a filter of "if I say this, how will I look? Will other person still like me?"
Just take a look at your favorite celebrity mag as an example. Brangelina has a big fight and Angelina moves her herd of kids to her mother's house in Florida. "She's taking the kids on a vacation to get some sun" claims Angelina's PR agent. "Brad will be joining them shortly."
The problem with employing PR agents is that our relationships then become conversations between agents. Mine will talk to yours and they will invent a fabulous story. Sounds great to anyone overhearing us on the subway. But we sure don't know much about the actual people represented by those agents. Do we really want to have relationships with our friends and family similar to our relationship with Angelina Jolie?
Here are some examples of the PR agent from the class participants:
- My friend is really self-centered and it annoys me sometimes, but I would never tell her this because it would ruin our friendship.
- If I tell my advisor that I don't want to be an academic, it will destroy our relationship. Therefore, I am deliberately vague when he asks me about my future plans.
- Sometimes I wonder if I still love my husband, but I am afraid to disrupt our marriage because he gives me security and stability. So I pretend that everything is fine.
- Any time I try to discuss my career with my mother, she lectures me, and so I just avoid talking about my career with her.
- I sometimes pretend that other people's ideas are mine so I look smarter.
Each of these people felt disconnected from their friend/advisor/husband/mother, and was looking for a greater sense of connection. Given the PR spin they have been feeding these people, it's no wonder.
The solution? Tell the truth. Let the real you come out and play... you don't need a PR agent. The real story, while more quirky and messy and can-of-worm opening, leads to a deep connection and a sense of pride and confidence in yourself. If Angelina is having a fight with Brad, it really is OK.
Image courtesy of http://www.benghiat.com
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)